CSX loses bid in US appeals court to revive antitrust claims against Norfolk Southern
By Mike Scarcella
Aug 29 (Reuters) -Freight rail giant CSX CSX.O on Thursday failed to persuade a U.S. appeals court to revive a lawsuit accusing rival Norfolk Southern NSC.N of denying access to a major East Coast marine terminal, causing it hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.
A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia said CSX’s allegations over the Norfolk International Terminal were untimely, falling outside the four-year window allowed for filing such claims under U.S. antitrust law.
The Richmond-based appeals court upheld a lower judge who ruled last year against CSX.
CSX, which had more than $14 billion in revenue last year, said in a statement on Thursday that it was “evaluating all options as we remain committed to gaining competitive access” at the terminal.
Norfolk Southern did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
International container ships use the Norfolk terminal to offload cargo onto trains and trucks that transport goods to inland destinations. Norfolk Southern owns tracks at the dock, but CSX does not.
CSX pays a “switch rate” for on-dock rail access, and it sued in 2018 claiming Norfolk Southern had conspired with Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Co to set an excessive amount.
Norfolk Southern and CSX, among the largest U.S. freight rail carriers, compete to transport containers that arrive at U.S. ports.
The appeals court said CSX’s claims against Norfolk Southern and Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line dated to 2009, making the lawsuit untimely since it was filed years later.
CSX countered that the statute of limitation clock was ongoing, since the allegedly unlawful switch rate was in place daily and the company had endured “accumulating harm” over many years.
In its appeal, CSX argued that the lower court ruling effectively created an immunity shield that would block lawsuits “so long as monopolists and conspirators maintain an anticompetitive practice for four years without challenge.”
But the panel judges — Circuit Judges Albert Diaz, A. Marvin Quattlebaum Jr. and Allison Jones Rushing — were not persuaded.
Diaz, writing for the court, said the decision to keep the same allegedly unlawful switch rate in place for years “didn’t inflict new harm causing new injury to CSX within the limitations period.”
The case is CSX Transportation v Norfolk Southern Railway et al, 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-1537.
For CSX: Charles Rothfeld of Mayer Brown, and Benjamin Hatch of McGuireWoods
For Norfolk Southern: Shay Dvoretzky of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
Read more:
Norfolk Southern loses bid for legal fees after beating rival CSX's lawsuit
Freight train maker Westinghouse Air Brake sued by rival over antitrust claims
U.S. judge scraps CSX jury trial in rail antitrust case
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
