Harvard's suit against insurance broker over affirmative action case coverage narrowed
By Nate Raymond
Aug 15 (Reuters) -A federal judge on Thursday dismissed part of a lawsuit by Harvard University accusing a broker of botching the school's claim for up to $15 million in insurance coverage to help pay its legal bills in the case that led the U.S. Supreme Court to bar the consideration of race as a factor in college admissions.
U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston ruled that Harvard waited too long to sue a unit of Marsh & McLennan MMC.N for breach of contract for failing to timely notify one of its excess insurance carriers of the affirmative action case.
That insurance carrier, a unit of Zurich Insurance Group, last year convinced a federal appeals court to hold that it had no obligation to cover expenses arising from a lawsuit filed in 2014 by Students for Fair Admissions.
That lawsuit, along with a related case against the University of North Carolina, resulted in a landmark Supreme Court ruling in June 2023 that ended affirmative action policies long used to raise the number of Black, Hispanic and other underrepresented minority students on American campuses.
Both cases were filed by SFFA, a nonprofit founded by affirmative action opponent Edward Blum, which alleged that Harvard's race-conscious admissions policies discriminated against Asian American applicants.
Harvard has said that the costs of defending against that lawsuit and a related government investigation exceeded the $25 million limit in a policy issued by its primary insurer, an AIG Inc unit, which had a $2.5 million deductible.
The universitywas represented by the law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr in the affirmative action case.
Harvard did not respond to a request for comment. Marsh declined to comment.
In a lawsuit filed in October, Harvard said after SFFA sued, it asked Marsh USA, its insurance broker, to report the matter to AIG for coverage but that unbeknownst to the school, Marsh did not also report SFFA's case to Zurich until 2017.
Harvard said its policy with Zurich would have entitled it to up to $15 million in coverage in excess of the $27.5 million. Zurich denied coverage, saying Harvard failed to provide it timely notice of its claim.
After Harvard lost its case against Zurich, it sued Marsh for breach of contract and malpractice for failing to provide timely notice of the SFFA case to Zurich as required under its agreement with the broker.
But Burroughs on Thursday said that under New York law, which she said governed, Harvard needed to have brought its breach of contract claims by September 2022 and that they were filed outside the statute of limitations.
Harvard's remaining claims for broker malpractice remain pending.
The case is President and Fellows of Harvard College v. Marsh USA Inc, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 1:23-cv-13017.
For Harvard: Robert Gilbert and Daniel Sack of Latham & Watkins
For Marsh: Jonathan Handler and Candace Hensley of Day Pitney
Read more:
Harvard cannot recoup $15 mln from insurer for race case costs, court rules
US Supreme Court rejects affirmative action in university admissions
Harvard can't force insurer to cover $15 mln in race-case defense costs - judge
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
