Lock maker Assa Abloy violating antitrust settlement, US Justice Dept says
By Mike Scarcella
July 3 (Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department has accused global lock maker Assa Abloy ASSAb.ST of violating the terms of a settlement that let it complete a $4.3 billion acquisition of Spectrum Brands' SPB.N hardware and home improvement unit last year.
Justice Department lawyers said in a Washington, D.C. court filing on Tuesday that Sweden’s Assa Abloy was failing to pay a court-appointed monitor supervising the company’s compliance with the settlement, which resolved government antitrust claims.
Assa Abloy stopped making payments in February to the monitor, Hausfeld’s Melinda Coolidge, according to the filing, which accused the company of reneging on its obligations.
The settlement came last year in a Justice Department lawsuit seeking to block Assa Abloy’s purchase of assets from U.S.-based Spectrum, which the government said would lead to higher prices. The deal, which did not include an admission of wrongdoing, came in the middle of a trial before U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes.
Assa Abloy and Coolidge did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Justice Department declined to comment.
Reyes has scheduled a hearing for July 9 on the government's request for an order forcing Assa Abloy to resume payments.
Assa Abloy makes Yale, August and EMTEK brands, and Spectrum's division makes the Baldwin and Kwikset brands.
Some U.S. settlements include court-approved monitorships to supervise and investigate a company's compliance. Coolidge, the U.S. managing partner of Hausfeld, one of the country’s largest plaintiffs firms, is charging $920 hourly for her monitor work.
Coolidge in an April letter to Assa Abloy called its objections to her work "unfounded."
Assa Abloy objected to Coolidge's fees in June, arguing that its payments would “exceed a jaw-dropping $20 million over the course of the monitorship.”
The company also asked the court to direct the monitor to stay within boundaries of the settlement, asserting that Coolidge had exceeded her authority by proposing to conduct an industry-wide, five-year study on smart locks.
The Justice Department countered that Assa Abloy was trying to stop Coolidge from completing a “key part” of her work.
The case is United States v. Assa Abloy and Spectrum Brands, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1:22-cv-02791-ACR.
For U.S.: Matthew Huppert and Miranda Isaacs of the Justice Department
For Assa Abloy: Justin Bernick and Lauren Battaglia of Hogan Lovells
Read more:
US legal team in Live Nation lawsuit includes veteran plaintiffs' attorney
Assa, Spectrum Brands reach settlement with US on deal
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
