London Metal Exchange looks to plug the liquidity drain: Andy Home
Repeats Monday's column with no changes to the text
By Andy Home
LONDON, Sept 9 (Reuters) -It says much about the London Metal Exchange that the focal point of its trading liquidity revolves around shipping times set in the late 19th century.
It took three months for Chilean copper and Malaysian tin to arrive in London when the LME was formally established in 1877. Modern ships can do the journey in a third of the time, but the LME's anchor price remains a rolling three-month contract.
The LME also retains one of the last surviving open outcry venues - its original red-seated ring - although it now co-exists with inter-office and electronic trading.
While other commodities exchanges have adopted a standardised monthly futures trading model, the LME remains at heart an arrivals market with a bewildering array of daily, weekly and monthly prompt dates.
This complex ecosystem serves to disperse liquidity across both dates and trading venues, but many of the LME's own members have played a part in fragmenting the marketplace.
The exchange has realised that if it is to remain a global metals trading hub in the 21st century, it needs to find a way to stop the liquidity drain.
FRAGMENTED LIQUIDITY
The core role of any exchange is "to centralise liquidity and provide the golden source for price information", to quote the LME's "White Paper on Enhancing Liquidity", released last week.
Yet only 48% of last year's traded volumes were transacted on the LMESelect electronic platform. This is a very low ratio by comparison with most other exchanges, which capture more than 95% of trades on a central electronic platform.
Moreover, while the rolling three-month date provides a liquidity point for electronic trading, that's not reflected in the distribution of open interest.
Around 75% of total open interest sits on the monthly third-Wednesday prompt dates even though only 2% of these trades are currently transacted through the central electronic system.
Quite evidently, a lot of trading activity is bypassing the LME's centralised dealing system to the detriment of price competition and transparency.
DARK POOLS
To some extent this has always been a problem.
The complexity of the LME's date structure requires the mediating skills of exchange members, whether it be to adjust a trade from the rolling three-month date to a monthly prompt or to structure an averaging trade for monthly price hedgers.
That's the essence of the inter-office section of the market.
LME members have always sought to offset such customer trades on their own trading books, meaning what's executed on exchange is a net fraction of the actual order flow.
What's changed in the last decade, however, is the proliferation of proprietary member trading systems. The traditional intermediary function has been industrialised.
The re-routing of liquidity from the exchange to the inter-office market has been compounded by the growing number of users opting for an over-the-counter trading relationship with LME members.
The European Market Infrastructure Regulation adopted in 2012 was intended to drive more OTC business onto exchanges. But it has backfired spectacularly when it comes to the LME.
The stricter rules on collateral have driven many smaller industrial users of the LME to OTC relationships with banks offering credit lines as part of the brokerage package.
Together with proprietary price-streaming platforms, the effect has been to create multiple dark pools of liquidity sitting close to, but not on, exchange.
The regulatory vulnerabilities created by this fragmentation were highlighted by the 2022 nickel crisis, when the LME lacked a clear understanding of positions that sprawled across both exchange and OTC platforms operated by multiple members.
BLOCK TRADE THRESHOLDS
The primary goal of the LME's package of proposals in the White Paper "is to increase liquidity in the central electronic venue which will ultimately improve the bid-offer spread and support better execution for end clients".
There are many components to the LME's liquidity booster plan, but the core is a proposal to introduce block trade thresholds.
Block trades are normally large-scale transactions negotiated outside of the electronic order book before being registered with the exchange.
Thresholds are already standard practice in other exchanges and block trades typically account for less than 5% of traded volumes in peer markets, the LME noted.
On the London exchange, by contrast, more than half of the exchange's volumes are conducted in the inter-office market, where there are no caps.
The LME is proposing a threshold of 10 lots for its core base metals contracts, excluding tin. Any trade below that size will be required to be executed electronically.
Daily prompts and cash date trading will be excluded in a nod to the exchange's industrial users seeking to lock in an average monthly price to match their physical pricing.
FEAR OF MISSING OUT
As ever with the LME, reform will be a slow process. The exchange is targeting the second half of next year to introduce any changes.
Members will likely fight a rearguard action, arguing over the devilish details.
But the LME is right to try to halt this growing fragmentation, if it wants to grab a share of the renewed investor interest in industrial metals such as aluminium, copper and nickel that are critical for decarbonisation.
CME Group CME.O has up to now reaped most of the rewards from the heightened investor appetite for all things metallic.
The U.S. exchange has successfully launched new contracts for battery metals lithium and cobalt, while also rolling out micro and weekly options products to enhance its benchmark copper contract.
The LME, by contrast, is currently too complex a trading landscape for many new investors. The fact that half of the exchange's trades are currently not visible on what is supposed to the central trading venue doesn't help.
If the LME is to retain its position as price setter for the world's metals trade, it's time to evolve from its 19th century business model.
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
Editing by Jan Harvey
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
