New horizons but same old problems for LME warehousing: Andy Home
By Andy Home
LONDON, Aug 1 (Reuters) -The London Metal Exchange (LME) has just listed the Saudi Arabian port of Jeddah as a good delivery location for copper and zinc.
This addition to the LME's global delivery network, which becomes effective three months after the approval of the first warehouse, is the first new listing since Amsterdam in 2018.
The exchange is also exploring the possibility of adding Hong Kong to the list, no doubt hoping that its owner Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing (HKEx) 0388.HK can help overcome the Chinese authorities' historical resistance to LME warehouses.
New locations may provide a booster for a warehouse network that has seen capacity contract and the number of operators decline over the last 10 years.
However, old problems persist.
There was a 253-day queue to load aluminium out of LME warehouses in Malaysia's Port Klang at the end of June, the longest waiting time since November 2016.
The LME storage business also remains highly concentrated with four dominant operators, a potential problem when one of them is facing an uncertain future.
SHRINKING SPACE
Total LME registered storage capacity at the end of June was 3.3 million square metres, down from 4.3 million three years ago.
The pace of net shrinkage slowed to 44,000 square metres over the last year and the downtrend shows signs of bottoming out. The number of registered warehouses grew by 15 units to 468 after falling to a multi-year low in June 2023.
The three-year decline in registered capacity reflected a period of low exchange stocks as combined warranted and shadow off-warrant inventory fell below one million metric tons over the second half of 2022.
Stocks have since risen to 2.3 million as of the end of May, although inflows have been tightly concentrated on just a handful of locations.
Russian aluminium has accumulated in the South Korean port of Gwangyang, while non-Russian aluminium has been dumped in Port Klang. This year's heavy inflows of both lead and zinc have mostly ended up at Singapore warehouses.
All three locations have bucked the trend of declining storage capacity over the last year and ISTIM UK Ltd's additional 11 warehouse units at Port Klang were the single biggest component of the broader year-on-year increase.
JOIN THE QUEUE
Rent-sharing is the common denominator behind this year's big deliveries of metal into the LME system. Such deals allow the entity that warrants the metal to earn a slice of the future rental revenue.
The buyer of that metal may be understandably reluctant to pay rent to a potential competitor but the only way to escape the contract is to physically load the metal out and deliver it to another warehouse company.
The larger the original warranting, the greater the potential for a queue. ISTIM warehouses in Port Klang received 652,525 tons of aluminium in May. The cancellations began almost immediately as buyers looked to move their metal. ISTIM had 505,050 tons awaiting physical load-out by the end of June.
It's an echo of the 2010s, when the LME's load-out problems caused user outrage and drew the unwelcome attention of U.S. regulators, who wanted to know why it would take 702 days to take physical delivery from LME warehouses in Detroit.
Subsequent reforms to the LME system mean that such self-perpetuating super-queues are no longer possible. What we get now are what the exchange calls "operational" queues.
Which may not be much comfort for those late to the aluminium logjam in Malaysia. They're unlikely to see their metal until this time next year.
DOMINANT FOUR
ISTIM's ability to attract such huge tonnages to its warehouses has made it a dominant presence in the LME delivery system. The company was storing 55% of all warranted LME stocks at the end of June.
The other three major players are Access World, C. Steinweg and the Pacorini Group. Between them they were storing 92% of total inventory at the end of June and they currently account for 344 of the total 468 units listed globally.
This is also a throw-back to the last decade, when Metro International, then owned by Goldman Sachs GS.N, industrialised the queue model and built a dominant LME storage position in Detroit.
Access World, acquired by Glencore GLEN.L in 2010, did the same in the Dutch port of Vlissingen, generating a load-out queue of 771 days at one stage.
Smaller operators struggled to compete then, and clearly they still do. Many who joined the LME warehouse business in hope of getting a slice of the queue action in the 2010s have since withdrawn.
The number of LME-registered warehouse operators has declined from 36 to 25 over the last five years and that includes nine that offer LME services in a single location.
WAREHOUSE FOR (RE)SALE
The uncertain status of Access World highlights the problems that can be caused when LME stocks are concentrated in such a small pool of warehouse operators.
Glencore thought it had sold the company to Global Capital Merchants (GCM), a company registered in the British Virgin Islands, in 2022.
However, Access World is back on the sales block after the buyers failed to make full payment and Glencore is reportedly scouting for new potential owners.
Access World warehouses held almost 12% of LME on-warrant stocks at the end of June.
A DECADE OF REFORM
The LME, to its credit, has spent a lot of time and effort trying to smooth out the many wrinkles in its delivery system, which - like everything else on the 147-year-old exchange - is quite distinct from what you would find in any other futures market.
The queues have never really gone away but multiple tweaks of the rule-book have at least constrained them and the amount of money that can be made from them.
The exchange has also massively enhanced transparency around its delivery network. A daily registered stocks report has been supplemented with monthly updates on off-warrant stocks, stocks by warehouse operator and, of course, queue length. This column has drawn heavily on all of them.
Yet, just how much more efficient is the LME's delivery network after a decade of reform?
A limited number of operators still seem to dominate the on-warrant storage business and 253 days is still a long time to wait to get your metal.
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters
LME Warehouse capacity decline shows signs of bottoming out https://tmsnrt.rs/4fjcEVE
LME Warehouse Stocks have rebuilt from the 2022 lows https://tmsnrt.rs/4c7l53q
ISTIM dominates the LME storage business https://tmsnrt.rs/4dgmOEO
Editing by David Evans
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
